Quadro NVS 420 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Quadro NVS 420
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16433.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16433.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+16433.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 770.2% better value per dollar than the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+770.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 16433.6%. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 22,651+16434% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+191% |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz | 2535 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 4.3 MB+412% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro NVS 420 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12.2+22% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-38% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 141.6+10014% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Quadro NVS 420 costs 94.7% less ($360 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 776.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-95% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 59.6+776% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD106 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #266 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
