Quadro NVS 510M vs GeForce GT 415
Quadro NVS 510M
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 415
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro NVS 510M is positioned at rank 273 and the GeForce GT 415 is on rank 224, so the GeForce GT 415 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 510M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 415
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 415 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro NVS 510M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 510M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 415 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 510M and GeForce GT 415
Quadro NVS 510M
The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.
GeForce GT 415
The GeForce GT 415 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 251 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 versus the GeForce GT 415's 251 — the GeForce GT 415 leads by 5.5%. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GT 415 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 144 (GeForce GT 415). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 238 | 251+5% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+167% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+67% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro NVS 510M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 415 has 512 MB. The Quadro NVS 510M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 384 KB (GeForce GT 415) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the GeForce GT 415's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce GT 415 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 415). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | GeForce GT 415 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 3.6+50% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 510M and GeForce GT 415
