CPU
GPU
Quadro NVS 510M
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro NVS 510M is positioned at rank 273 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is on rank 590, so the Quadro NVS 510M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 510M
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro NVS 510M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3670.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro NVS 510M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 510M and Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Quadro NVS 510M
The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 232 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro NVS 510M scores 238 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 reaches 232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 510M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3670).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 238+3% | 232 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+62% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+860% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 3670) — the Quadro NVS 510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 510M draws 100W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3670's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 510M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 2.4 | 4.6+92% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 510M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 510M | Mobility Radeon HD 3670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | February 22 2011 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #733 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 510M and Mobility Radeon HD 3670
