Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#119

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1379%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

100%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

99%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

99%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

93%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

93%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

92%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

92%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

90%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

89%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

88%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

88%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

86%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.

Insight	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 385.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+385.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P2000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 reaches 5,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448).

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
G3D Mark Score	5,353+3%	5,200
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1152+157%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.974 TFLOPS+127%	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	72+29%	56
L1 Cache	432 KB	896 KB+107%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+98%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	320-bit+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+98%	0.63 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448's 210W — a 94.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
TDP	75W-64%	210W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	76°C
Perf/Watt	71.4+188%	24.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 385.4% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro P2000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
MSRP	$500	$289-42%
Avg Price (30d)	$150	$30-80%
Performance per Dollar	35.7	173.3+385%
Codename	GP106	GF110
Release	February 15 2019	November 29 2011
Ranking	#399	#571