
Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 950

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 212.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+212.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 950

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 1188 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,357 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+50% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS+63% | 1.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz+9% | 1188 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+50% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB+50% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-17% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+20% | 59.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 and now averages $48. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 68% less ($102 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 212.6% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $159-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $48-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.7 | 111.6+213% |
| Codename | GP106 | GM206 |
| Release | February 15 2019 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #399 | #425 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















