Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+28700% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz | 1950 MHz+51% |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB | 768 KB+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 366.7+414% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP106 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | February 15 2019 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #399 | #495 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
