
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,474+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1344+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS+13% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz+32% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB+286% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+150% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+150% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-56% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+122% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | GK104 |
| Release | February 15 2019 | September 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #399 | #417 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















