CPU
GPU
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 52.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Arc A310
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Arc A310 reaches 5,438 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Arc A310 uses Generation 12.7, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 768 (Arc A310). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,438+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+50% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz | 2000 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+125% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 1.1 MB+162% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 4 MB (Arc A310) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 4 MB+220% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Arc A310's 75W — a 0% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 300W (Arc A310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 169mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 72.5+2% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Arc A310 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Arc A310 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 54.4 (Arc A310) — the Arc A310 offers 52.4% better value. The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $100-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.7 | 54.4+52% |
| Codename | GP106 | DG2-128 |
| Release | February 15 2019 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #399 | #422 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Arc A310
