Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 66.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 66.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 760M instead at 5,449 vs 5,353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 16nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,353
5,449+2%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1152+125%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.974 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+79%
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2599 MHz+101%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
72+125%
32
L1 Cache
432 KB+238%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel) and System on the Radeon 760M. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
71.4
363.3+409%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
MSRP
$500
Codename
GP106
Phoenix
Release
February 15 2019
January 31 2024
Ranking
#399
#421

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.