
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 75W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 18W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1200 Mobile better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Quadro T1200 Mobile

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS+2% | 2.918 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz | 1425 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 1 MB+138% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Quadro T1200 Mobile's 18W — a 122.6% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 18W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 305.6+328% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | TU117 |
| Release | February 15 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #399 | #347 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













