GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 26.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM instead at 5,474 vs 5,353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1291 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMQuadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,474+2%
5,353
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1344+17%
1152
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1291 MHz+32%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+56%
72
L1 Cache
112 KB
432 KB+286%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.25 MB+150%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMQuadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMQuadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.25 MB+150%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMQuadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP
170W
75W-56%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.2
71.4+122%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMQuadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$500
Codename
GK104
GP106
Release
September 27 2013
February 15 2019
Ranking
#417
#399

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.