Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is positioned at rank #8 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

182%

#8

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Insight	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1392 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score	6,500+2%	6,350
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.032 TFLOPS+135%	2.138 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1404 MHz	1392 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	672 KB+133%	288 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.