
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GRID P40-3Q

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is positioned at rank 8 and the GRID P40-3Q is on rank 341, so the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-3Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3200 Max-Q.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P40-3Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and GRID P40-3Q

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,570+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.032 TFLOPS+120% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+425% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | Tesla NVENC x24 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | Tesla NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+197% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5699 |
| Codename | GP104 | GK104 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #292 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















