Quadro P4000 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 94% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-94%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+94%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000, it costs 31% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 181.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+181.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 94%. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 22,172+94% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 5888+229% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+283% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1725 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 184+64% |
| L1 Cache | 0.66 MB | 5.8 MB+779% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 70.8% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-52% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+8% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 31% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.4 (Quadro P4000) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 181.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $499-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $290 | $200-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.4 | 110.9+181% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA104 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #239 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
