Quadro P4200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Quadro P4200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4200.
| Insight | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, it costs 27% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 19% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 14.6%. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,376 | 11,892+15% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz | 1755 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 2.5 MB+198% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 105mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 105mm | 235mm |
| Height | 82mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 103.8+13% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4200 launched at $1200 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Quadro P4200 costs 26.7% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.3 (Quadro P4200) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Quadro P4200 offers 18.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1200 | $249-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-27% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.3+19% | 79.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #266 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
