
Quadro P4200

Tesla T4
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla T4 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla T4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla T4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $680 less on MSRP ($1,200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 168mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌56.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$1,200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ❌60% longer card at 168mm vs 105mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla T4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 and the Tesla T4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1590 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,376+2% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS | 8.141 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz+4% | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 2.5 MB+198% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4200 and 256-bit on the Tesla T4. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 76°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 105mm | 168mm |
| Height | 82mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 76°C-5% |
| Perf/Watt | 103.8 | 145.0+40% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P4200 came in at $1200, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. On MSRP, Quadro P4200 was 36.2% cheaper ($680 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro P4200) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the Quadro P4200 offers 59.3% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1200-36% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+59% | 5.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #266 | #260 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














