Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40
Quadro P4200
Popular choices:
Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P4200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P4200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M40 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M40.
| Insight | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $1,099 for the Tesla M40, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 914.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+914.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,099) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 and Tesla M40
Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,376+2% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS+11% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz+48% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 1.1 MB+31% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 105mm | 267mm |
| Height | 82mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 103.8+154% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4200 launched at $1200 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500 and now averages $1099. The Quadro P4200 costs 90% less ($989 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.3 (Quadro P4200) vs 9.3 (Tesla M40) — the Quadro P4200 offers 914% better value. The Quadro P4200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1200-52% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-90% | $1099 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.3+914% | 9.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM200 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #266 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4200 and Tesla M40
