
Quadro P4200

Tesla M40
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P4200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($1,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 111.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Tesla M40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P4200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌108.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
- ❌154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4200
The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,376+2% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS+11% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz+48% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 192+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 1.1 MB+31% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4200 and 256-bit on the Tesla M40. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 105mm | 267mm |
| Height | 82mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 103.8+154% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P4200 came in at $1200, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Quadro P4200 was 52% cheaper ($1300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro P4200) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the Quadro P4200 offers 109.8% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P4200 (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1200-52% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+110% | 4.1 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM200 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #266 | #256 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














