Quadro P4200 vs RTX A1000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4200 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P4200 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 163mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
60.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $451 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌55.2% longer card at 163mm vs 105mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P4200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A1000 instead at 10,814 vs 10,376, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $451 cheaper on MSRP at $749 vs $1,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 67% (14.4 vs 8.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P4200 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 and the RTX A1000 reaches 10,814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1462 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score	10,376	10,814+4%
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	16 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.589 TFLOPS+13%	6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1647 MHz+13%	1462 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+100%	72
L1 Cache	0.84 MB	2.3 MB+174%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4200 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000.

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 163mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	105mm	163mm
Height	82mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	103.8	216.3+108%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P4200 came in at $1200, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 37.6% cheaper ($451 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro P4200) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 offers 67.4% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro P4200	RTX A1000
MSRP	$1200	$749-38%
Performance per Dollar	8.6	14.4+67%
Codename	GP104	GA107
Release	February 21 2018	April 16 2024
Ranking	#266	#251

Search Quadro P4200 on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.