Quadro P4200 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

157%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

153%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

148%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

146%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

144%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

143%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

139%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

137%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

126%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

120%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

104%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

100%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

88%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

82%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

82%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

81%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

78%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

77%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

74%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

73%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

71%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

70%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

69%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

68%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

64%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 31.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+31.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-31.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $110 for the Quadro P4200, it costs 32% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 11.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+11.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P4200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro P4200 leads by 31.9%. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	10,376+32%	7,869
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.589 TFLOPS+154%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1647 MHz	1665 MHz+1%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+157%	56
L1 Cache	864 KB	896 KB+4%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P4200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro P4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro P4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 105mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro P4200	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	105mm	229mm
Height	82mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	103.8	104.9+1%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P4200 launched at $1200 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 31.8% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.3 (Quadro P4200) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 11.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).