Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 24GB

NVIDIA

Quadro P4200

2018Core: 1227 MHzBoost: 1647 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

2015Core: 948 MHzBoost: 1112 MHz
Similar parts
·

Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 24GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $800 less on MSRP ($1,200 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 62.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Tesla M40 24GB is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P4200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
  • Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Tesla M40 24GB

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$1,200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
  • 154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla M40 24GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (10,641 vs 10,376), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P4200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $1,200 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.5% (8.6 vs 5.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla M40 24GB still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P4200 vs Tesla M40 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M40 24GB

The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4200 scores 10,376 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
G3D Mark Score
10,376
10,641+3%
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.589 TFLOPS+11%
6.832 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1647 MHz+48%
1112 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
144
192+33%
L1 Cache
0.84 MB
1.1 MB+31%
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4200 and 256-bit on the Tesla M40 24GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P4200) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4200 draws 100W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4200) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
TDP
100W-60%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
105mm
267mm
Height
82mm
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
103.8+144%
42.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P4200 came in at $1200, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. On MSRP, Quadro P4200 was 40% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro P4200) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Quadro P4200 offers 62.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P4200 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P4200Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP
$1200-40%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
8.6+62%
5.3
Codename
GP104
GM200
Release
February 21 2018
November 10 2015
Ranking
#266
#253

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.