
Quadro RTX 8000 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro RTX 8000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro RTX 8000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 98% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (48 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+98%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-98%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $9,999 for the Quadro RTX 8000, it costs 99% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 8316.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8316.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($9,999) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Quadro RTX 8000 leads by 98%. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927+98% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+84% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+2% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+379% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 300% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+700% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+300% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 180W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6+37% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP and currently averages $9999, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 99.4% less ($9939 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 8285% better value. The Quadro RTX 8000 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $249-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9999 | $60-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 167.7+8285% |
| Codename | TU102 | GP104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #78 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














