Quadro RTX 8000
Radeon PRO W6800
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon PRO W6800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon PRO W6800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon PRO W6800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌344.6% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,750 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 352.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon PRO W6800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,270+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+20% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 17.82 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2320 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+20% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+20% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 8000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 carries 32 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+50% | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+33% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 81.1+6% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6800 was 77.5% cheaper ($7750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 350% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6800 (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $2249-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 9.0+350% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #78 | #74 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 8000 and Radeon PRO W6800
