
Quadro RTX 8000

Radeon RX 6700 XT
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1987.5% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,520 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1969.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 6700 XT reaches 19,754 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 19,754 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+23% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2581 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+80% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX 8000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT carries 12 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6700 XT. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+100% | 384 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 12.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 230W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 85.9+12% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6700 XT was 95.2% cheaper ($9520 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers 1960% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700 XT (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $479-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 41.2+1960% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #78 | #80 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














