
Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN RTX

Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN RTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 8000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN RTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,203.96 versus $9,999 for the Quadro RTX 8000, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 737.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+737.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($9,999) | ✅More affordable ($1,203.96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and TITAN RTX

Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 576 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288 | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72 | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | 576 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 14.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+100% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+14% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 7.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-7% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6+7% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP and currently averages $9999, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499 and now averages $1203.96. The TITAN RTX costs 88% less ($8795 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 16.7 (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX offers 735% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $2499-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9999 | $1203.96-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 16.7+735% |
| Codename | TU102 | TU102 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #78 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














