G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 8000

2018

Why buy it

✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
300.1% HIGHER MSRP
$9,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

TITAN RTX

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 303.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 8000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward TITAN RTX instead at 20,095 vs 19,927, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 8000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 48 GB vs 24 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

TITAN RTX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,500 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 vs $9,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 303.5% (8.0 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, TITAN RTX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 8000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 8000

The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

TITAN RTX

The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 576 Tensor cores vs 576.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
G3D Mark Score	19,927	20,095
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4608	4608
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	1770 MHz
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	288	288
L1 Cache	4.5 MB	4.5 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72	72
Tensor Cores	576	576

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 14.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+100%	24 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+14%	672 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit	384-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 7.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
TDP	260W-7%	280W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	116mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	76.6+7%	71.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, TITAN RTX was 75% cheaper ($7500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX offers 300% better value.

Feature	Quadro RTX 8000	TITAN RTX
MSRP	$9999	$2499-75%
Performance per Dollar	2.0	8.0+300%
Codename	TU102	TU102
Release	August 13 2018	December 18 2018
Ranking	#78	#91

Search Quadro RTX 8000 on Amazon

Search TITAN RTX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.