Quadro RTX 8000
TITAN V
Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN V Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅34.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅TITAN V is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 8000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌233.4% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$2,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,000 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 8000 vs TITAN V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 5120+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+9% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+22% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288 | 320+11% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 7.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+33% | 4.5 MB |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | 640+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 8000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The TITAN V leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V carries 12 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 17.6% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 3072-bit on the TITAN V. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+18% | 653 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 3072-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+33% | 4.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 80.3+5% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. On MSRP, TITAN V was 70% cheaper ($7000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the TITAN V offers 235% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 8000 (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $2999-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 6.7+235% |
| Codename | TU102 | GV100 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #78 | #109 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 8000 and TITAN V
