
Quadro RTX 8000

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅48.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌2765% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 58.3 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $9,650 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2826.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 3130 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,352 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB reaches 20,352 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB uses RDNA 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 25.64 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 3130 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927 | 20,352+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 25.64 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 3130 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+125% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+125% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX 8000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 8000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — a 140% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+140% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB's 160W — a 47.6% difference. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 260mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 78.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 160W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 260mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 78-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 127.2+66% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB launched at $349. On MSRP, Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB was 96.5% cheaper ($9650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 58.3 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers 2815% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $349-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 58.3+2815% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 44 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | June 4 2025 |
| Ranking | #78 | #77 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














