Quadro RTX 8000 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+500%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 8000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,555 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU reaches 19,555 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) with 576 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927+2% | 19,555 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 7680+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+146% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2610 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 288+20% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 7.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+20% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 576+140% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 8000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) — a 200% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+200% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU's 285W — a 9.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 8000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-9% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6+12% | 68.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $9999 | — |
| Codename | TU102 | AD104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #78 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 8000 and GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
