
Quadro RTX 8000

RTX A4000
Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌800% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,888 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 779% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 260W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 576 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927+2% | 19,463 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+50% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 6 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+50% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 576+200% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 8000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 8000 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+71% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 60% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 140W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 139.0+81% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 8000 came in at $9999, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. On MSRP, RTX A4000 was 88.9% cheaper ($8888 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 offers 775% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000 (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $1111-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 17.5+775% |
| Codename | TU102 | GA104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #78 | #85 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














