
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌800% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,888 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 779% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 260W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 8000
2018RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 192).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,888 less on MSRP ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 779% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 260W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌800% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$1,111 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than RTX A4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4000 make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 897 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 8000 and RTX A4000

Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 8000 scores 19,927 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 8000 is built on Turing while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 48 (RTX A4000) with 576 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,927+2% | 19,463 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+13% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+50% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 6 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+50% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 576+200% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 8000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+71% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 8000 draws 260W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 60% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 140W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.6 | 139.0+81% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The RTX A4000 costs 88.9% less ($8888 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 offers 775% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 8000 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $1111-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 17.5+775% |
| Codename | TU102 | GA104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #78 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












