Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Quadro M4000
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 105 and the Quadro M4000 is on rank 159, so the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $350 for the Quadro M4000, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 143.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+143.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T2000 (móvel) and Quadro M4000
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,959+4% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1,280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS+46% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+76% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+113% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000 has 8 GB. The Quadro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 50% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-40% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.0+74% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791 and now averages $350. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) costs 57.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 19.1 (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers 142.9% better value. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-37% | $791 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-57% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.4+143% | 19.1 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #319 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T2000 (móvel) and Quadro M4000
