
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Firepro M4100

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:

Firepro M4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is positioned at rank #465 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro M4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Firepro M4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $100 for the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 229.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+229.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and Firepro M4100
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
Firepro M4100
The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Firepro M4100 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,072+1% | 1,059 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Firepro M4100 has 2 GB. The Firepro M4100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Firepro M4100's 30W — a 124.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (Firepro M4100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-77% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 70mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.1+334% | 35.3 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Firepro M4100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The Firepro M4100 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 35.3 (Firepro M4100) — the Firepro M4100 offers 229.9% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | Firepro M4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 35.3+230% |
| Codename | — | Mars |
| Release | December 6 2018 | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #860 | #866 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















