Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs GeForce 940A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is positioned at rank 465 and the GeForce 940A is on rank 320, so the GeForce 940A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

#455

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2026%

#457

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1836%

#458

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1831%

#462

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1665%

#463

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1654%

#465

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

100%

#466

Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#467

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8790M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#468

Radeon R5 M230

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

99%

#469

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#470

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

98%

#471

Radeon R9 M370X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

98%

#472

Radeon HD 8280

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

97%

#473

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

95%

#474

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#475

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

95%

#476

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

95%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

94%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

93%

#480

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940A

#310

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

784%

#312

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

711%

#313

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

709%

#317

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

645%

#318

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

641%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

100%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

99%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

98%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

97%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

93%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

92%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

92%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

90%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 940A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $100 for the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 29.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+29.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)	✅More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU Benchmark Check

GeForce 940A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and GeForce 940A

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

GeForce 940A

The GeForce 940A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,107 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the GeForce 940A reaches 1,107 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
G3D Mark Score	1,072	1,107+3%
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 940A has 512 MB. The GeForce 940A offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce 940A's 33W — a 130% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (GeForce 940A). Power connectors: Integrated vs Legacy.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	GeForce 940A
TDP	7W-79%	33W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Legacy
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	153.1+357%	33.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 940A launched at $80 and now averages $80. The GeForce 940A costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 13.8 (GeForce 940A) — the GeForce 940A offers 29% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).