CPU
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is positioned at rank 465 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the GeForce 920MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 920MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 920MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 920MX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $54 versus $100 for the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU, it costs 46% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 83.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+83.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($54) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and GeForce 920MX
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.
GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,072 | 1,064 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX has 512 MB. The GeForce 920MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 78.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-56% | 16W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 153.1+130% | 66.5 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The GeForce 920MX costs 46% less ($46 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.7 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX offers 84.1% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $54-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7 | 19.7+84% |
| Codename | — | GM108 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #860 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and GeForce 920MX
