Radeon 620 vs Quadro 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Quadro 2000 is on rank 314, so the Quadro 2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620

#365

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1138%

#367

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1032%

#368

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1029%

#372

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

936%

#373

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

929%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#376

Radeon R5 435

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

100%

#377

Radeon R9 M470X

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

97%

#379

Radeon R9 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

96%

#380

Radeon HD 7640G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

95%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

93%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

91%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

91%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

90%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

99%

#299

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9350%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

100%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

99%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

97%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

97%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

96%

#320

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

96%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

96%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

94%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

90%

#324

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

90%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

88%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

87%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

87%

#328

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

87%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $50 for the Radeon 620, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 98.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+98.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 620 Benchmark Check

Quadro 2000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Quadro 2000

Radeon 620

The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Quadro 2000 reaches 948 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

Feature	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score	954	948
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS+64%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The Quadro 2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 620	Quadro 2000
TDP	50W-19%	62W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	178mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	19.1+25%	15.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 620 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The Quadro 2000 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 37.9 (Quadro 2000) — the Quadro 2000 offers 98.4% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).