Radeon 620 vs Quadro CX
Radeon 620
Popular choices:
Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Quadro CX is on rank 383, so the Radeon 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Per Dollar Quadro CX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro CX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro CX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the Quadro CX, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 907.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+907.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Quadro CX
Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 954 | 947 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+70% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The Quadro CX offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 192 KB (Quadro CX) — the Quadro CX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 19.1+203% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 620 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999 and now averages $500. The Radeon 620 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 1.9 (Quadro CX) — the Radeon 620 offers 905.3% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-95% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1+905% | 1.9 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GT200B |
| Release | May 13 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #898 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 620 and Quadro CX
