
Radeon 620 vs Quadro 2000D

Radeon 620
Popular choices:

Quadro 2000D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Quadro 2000D is on rank 311, so the Quadro 2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 620.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon 620, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Quadro 2000D

Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Quadro 2000D
The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Quadro 2000D reaches 980 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro 2000D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 192 (Quadro 2000D). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 954 | 980+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+64% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000D) — the Quadro 2000D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Quadro 2000D's 62W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Quadro 2000D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-19% | 62W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 19.1+21% | 15.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 620 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro 2000D launched at $599 and now averages $40. The Quadro 2000D costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) — the Quadro 2000D offers 28.3% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-83% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 24.5+28% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GF106 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #898 | #892 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











