
Radeon 625
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 625
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8750M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8750M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon HD 8750M
2013Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Radeon 625
2019Radeon HD 8750M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8750M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8750M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 625 better than Radeon HD 8750M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8750M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 625 and Radeon HD 8750M

Radeon 625
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Radeon HD 8750M
Radeon HD 8750M
The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Radeon HD 8750M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,077+2% | 1,052 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+53% | 0.5146 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz+32% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 625 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 625) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8750M) — the Radeon HD 8750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 8750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.5+2% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 625 | Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Mars |
| Release | May 13 2019 | February 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #858 | #869 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













