Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 M465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 625

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Radeon R7 M465 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 625 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20% HIGHER MSRP
$120 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 625 instead at 1,077 vs 1,059, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 625 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 625 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22% (10.8 vs 8.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M465 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon 625 vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Radeon R7 M465 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score	1,077+2%	1,059
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.864 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1125 MHz+10%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon 625 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 625 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M465
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	21.5+52%	14.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 625 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon 625 was 16.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.8 (Radeon 625) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the Radeon 625 offers 22.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 625 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon 625	Radeon R7 M465
MSRP	$100-17%	$120
Performance per Dollar	10.8+23%	8.8
Codename	Polaris 24	Topaz
Release	May 13 2019	May 15 2016
Ranking	#858	#867

Search Radeon 625 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.