
Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank #294 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,474 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1344+163% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS+102% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+165% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+14% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+1028% | 32.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















