Radeon 760M vs L2
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank 294 and the L2 is on rank 254, so the L2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Per Dollar L2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The L2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the L2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and L2
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 760M) vs 92 (L2) vs 368.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,467 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 11776+2200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+1015% |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+3% | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 368+1050% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 11.5 MB+8746% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 92+1050% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 96 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the L2's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+1726% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1500 |
| Codename | Phoenix | AD102 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #421 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 760M and L2
