Radeon 760M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank 294 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile is on rank 30, so the Quadro T1200 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1200 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon 760M | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1200 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Quadro T1200 Mobile
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS+82% | 2.918 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+82% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Quadro T1200 Mobile's 18W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-17% | 18W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+19% | 305.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 760M and Quadro T1200 Mobile
