
Radeon 890M vs Quadro P3200

Radeon 890M
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 890M is positioned at rank 286 and the Quadro P3200 is on rank 86, so the Quadro P3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 890M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 890M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Radeon 890M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 890M.
| Insight | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 890M and Quadro P3200

Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,175 | 8,578+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+7% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+88% | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 672 KB+163% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 545.0+376% | 114.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 890M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $63 |
| Codename | Strix Point | GP104 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #312 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















