Radeon 890M vs Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Radeon 890M
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 890M is positioned at rank 286 and the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is on rank 150, so the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 890M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 890M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 890M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 890M and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 890M scores 8,175 and the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design reaches 8,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 890M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 890M) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon 890M) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) vs 288.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,175 | 8,119 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2304+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+6% | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+139% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 144+125% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.3 MB+820% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 36+125% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 890M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 890M) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 890M) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 890M draws 15W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 120% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 890M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 890M | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-75% | 60W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 545.0+303% | 135.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 890M and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
