RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
40% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

RADEON HD6410D

2023

Why buy it

✅716.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11744% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD6410D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 716.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8360% in PassMark G3D (423 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 5nm, 16 vs 2 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2023. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6410D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $14 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11744% (12.1 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD6410D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9000 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON 9000 vs RADEON HD6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

RADEON HD6410D

The RADEON HD6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 423 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the RADEON HD6410D's 423 — the RADEON HD6410D leads by 8360%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON HD6410D uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 128 (RADEON HD6410D). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6410D). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2200 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RADEON 9000) vs 2 (RADEON HD6410D).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON HD6410D
G3D Mark Score	5	423+8360%
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1024+700%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.939 TFLOPS+955%	0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+32%	2200 MHz
ROPs	32+700%	4
TMUs	64+700%	8
L1 Cache	256 KB+700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	16+700%	2

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON HD6410D
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6410D carries 512 MB. RADEON HD6410D gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9000 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6410D.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON HD6410D
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the RADEON HD6410D's 15W — a 0% difference. The RADEON HD6410D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (RADEON HD6410D). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON HD6410D
TDP	15W	15W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.3	28.2+9300%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9000 came in at $49, while the RADEON HD6410D launched at $35. On MSRP, RADEON HD6410D was 28.6% cheaper ($14 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (RADEON 9000) vs 12.1 (RADEON HD6410D) — the RADEON HD6410D offers 12000% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	RADEON 9000	RADEON HD6410D
MSRP	$49	$35-29%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	12.1+12000%
Codename	Strix Point	Dragon Range
Release	July 15 2024	January 3 2023
Ranking	#312	#843

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6410D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.