RADEON 9000 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9000

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-7480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
40% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 19.9 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

✅1500.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19416% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1500.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 13840% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $14 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19416% (19.9 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9000 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON 9000 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9000

The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9000 scores 5 versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 697 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 13840%. The RADEON 9000 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (RADEON 9000) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9000	Radeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score	5	697+13840%
Architecture	RDNA 3.5	GCN 4.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.939 TFLOPS+2%	5.834 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2900 MHz+129%	1266 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	144+125%
L1 Cache	256 KB	576 KB+125%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9000	Radeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9000 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 A6-7480 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480.

Feature	RADEON 9000	Radeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9000 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9000) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	RADEON 9000	Radeon R5 A6-7480
TDP	15W-90%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Perf/Watt	0.3	4.6+1433%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON 9000 came in at $49, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon R5 A6-7480 was 28.6% cheaper ($14 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (RADEON 9000) vs 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 19800% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9000 (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	RADEON 9000	Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP	$49	$35-29%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	19.9+19800%
Codename	Strix Point	Ellesmere
Release	July 15 2024	June 29 2016
Ranking	#312	#305

Search RADEON 9000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A6-7480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.