CPU
GPU
RADEON 9500
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9500 is positioned at rank #737 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 9500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 32933.3% higher G3D Mark score and 6300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-32933.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+32933.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6506.7% better value per dollar than the RADEON 9500.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6506.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 scores 36 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 32933.3%. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36 | 11,892+32933% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1755 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.5 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9500 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 6300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON 9500) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 8 GB+6300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 31.1% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-27% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 91.5+22775% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The RADEON 9500 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 6508.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179-28% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-80% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 79.3+6508% |
| Codename | Amethyst | GA106 |
| Release | September 29 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #420 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9500 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
