
Radeon E8860
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon E8860
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M275X
2014Why buy it
- ✅5.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Radeon E8860
2014Radeon R9 M275X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 75W, a 38W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅5.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M275X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌102.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 37W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon E8860 better than Radeon R9 M275X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M275X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E8860 and Radeon R9 M275X

Radeon E8860
Radeon E8860
The Radeon E8860 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,686 points.

Radeon R9 M275X
Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E8860 scores 1,686 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E8860 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon E8860) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8860) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,686+3% | 1,631 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 925 MHz+48% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E8860 draws 37W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 67.9% difference. The Radeon E8860 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon E8860) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 37W-51% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 45.6+110% | 21.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E8860 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon E8860) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Radeon E8860 offers 3.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon E8860 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6+4% | 5.4 |
| Codename | Venus | Venus |
| Release | January 25 2014 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #734 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













