Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce GT 440
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4810 is positioned at rank 113 and the GeForce GT 440 is on rank 129, so the Radeon HD 4810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 440 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4810 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 168.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+168.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4810 and GeForce GT 440
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce GT 440
The GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 770 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the GeForce GT 440 reaches 770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GT 440 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 384 (GeForce GT 440). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 440).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 770 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+78% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+400% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 4810 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 440 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 440 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 11 (11_0) (GeForce GT 440). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 4810) vs None (GeForce GT 440). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4810) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 440).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the GeForce GT 440's 64W — a 99.2% difference. The GeForce GT 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 300W (GeForce GT 440). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 246mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 65.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 64W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 246mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 65-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 12.0+193% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 440 launched at $79 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 19.3 (GeForce GT 440) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 167.9% better value. The GeForce GT 440 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GeForce GT 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-11% | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+168% | 19.3 |
| Codename | RV790 | GK107 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #762 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4810 and GeForce GT 440
