Radeon HD 4810 vs GRID M10-0Q
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4810 is positioned at rank 113 and the GRID M10-0Q is on rank 389, so the Radeon HD 4810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2009). The GRID M10-0Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-0Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4810.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4810 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 873.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+873.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4810 and GRID M10-0Q
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
GRID M10-0Q
The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the GRID M10-0Q reaches 796 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the GRID M10-0Q uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 640 (GRID M10-0Q). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 796+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4810) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12_1+19% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the GRID M10-0Q's 225W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon HD 4810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (GRID M10-0Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 246mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-16% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 246mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+17% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 and now averages $150. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 875.5% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | GRID M10-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-97% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+875% | 5.3 |
| Codename | RV790 | GM107 |
| Release | April 2 2009 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #762 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4810 and GRID M10-0Q
