Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon 535DX
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
Radeon 535DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4810 is positioned at rank 113 and the Radeon 535DX is on rank 264, so the Radeon HD 4810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 535DX is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The Radeon 535DX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4810 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 535DX.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (246mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $40 for the Radeon 535DX, it costs 63% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 167% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+167%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon 535DX
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon 535DX
The Radeon 535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 774 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 4810 scores 775 and the Radeon 535DX reaches 774 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4810 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon 535DX uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 512 (Radeon 535DX). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 535DX).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 775 | 774 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+9% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4810) vs 512 KB (Radeon 535DX) — the Radeon 535DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 4810 draws 190W versus the Radeon 535DX's 50W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon 535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4810) vs 350W (Radeon 535DX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 246mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 15.5+278% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon 535DX launched at $200 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) vs 19.4 (Radeon 535DX) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 166.5% better value. The Radeon 535DX is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon 535DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-65% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+166% | 19.4 |
| Codename | RV790 | Lexa |
| Release | April 2 2009 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #762 | #772 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon 535DX
