
Radeon HD 7670 vs GeForce GT 635

Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7670 is positioned at rank 401 and the GeForce GT 635 is on rank 152, so the GeForce GT 635 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 635 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 635 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7670 and GeForce GT 635

Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7670 scores 803 and the GeForce GT 635 reaches 810 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GT 635 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 352 (GeForce GT 635). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 803 | 810 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+36% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.8554 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 44+83% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 704 KB+1367% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7670 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 7670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) — the GeForce GT 635 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7670 draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 635's 200W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670) vs 200W (GeForce GT 635). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-78% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 200W-43% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.8+345% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 635 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) vs 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 26.2% better value. The Radeon HD 7670 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7670 | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $99-1% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.1 | 40.5+26% |
| Codename | Turks | GF100 |
| Release | January 5 2012 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #870 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












